Search for: "Miller v. District Court, et al" Results 1 - 20 of 395
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Indiana Trademark Litigation Update – Property Damage Appraisers v. John Mosley et al
17 Sep 2014, 2:06 pm by Kenan Farrell
John Mosley et al Court Case Number: 1:14-cv-01490-RLY-MJDFile Date: Friday, September 12, 2014Plaintiff: Property Damage Appraisers Inc.Plaintiff Counsel: Derek R. [read post]
Indiana Intellectual Property & Technology Blog - http://indianaintellectualproperty.com/
Oral Argument Preview: Construing Ohio’s Construction Statute of Repose. New Riegel Local School District Board of Education et al. v. The Buehrer Group Architecture & Engineering, Inc., et al.
26 Feb 2019, 5:12 am by MBettman
On March 5, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of New Riegel Local School District Board of Education et al. v. [read post]
Legally Speaking Ohio - http://www.legallyspeakingohio.com
No Miller Act Setoff for Non-Federal Claims
5 Aug 2009, 2:00 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia last month. [read post]
Construction Law Musings - http://constructionlawva.com
What’s On Their Minds: Construing Ohio’s Construction Statute of Repose. New Riegel Local School District Board of Education et al. v. The Buehrer Group Architecture & Engineering, Inc., et al.
15 Mar 2019, 6:54 am by MBettman
On March 5, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of New Riegel Local School District Board of Education et al. v. [read post]
Legally Speaking Ohio - http://www.legallyspeakingohio.com
Oral Argument Preview: Who Gets the Rent Money? LRC Realty, Inc. v. B.E.B. Properties New Par, d.b.a. Verizon Wireless, et al., v. Bruce Bird, et al.
4 Dec 2019, 8:09 am by MBettman
Verizon Wireless, et al., v. [read post]
Legally Speaking Ohio - http://www.legallyspeakingohio.com
Oral Argument Preview: Private Sector Employer Drug Testing and Employee Invasion of Privacy. Donna L. Lunsford et al. v. Sterilite of Ohio, LLC et al.
20 Jan 2020, 6:36 am by MBettman
Lunsford, et al. v. [read post]
Legally Speaking Ohio - http://www.legallyspeakingohio.com
Christopher et al. v. Smithkline Beecham Corp., dba Glaxosmithkline holds, 5-4, that pharma sales reps are exempt as "outside salespersons"
18 Jun 2012, 5:48 pm by The Complex Litigator
The United States Supreme Court, in Christopher et al. v. [read post]
the complex litigator - http://www.thecomplexlitigator.com/post-data/
What’s On Their Minds: Who Gets the Rent Money? LRC Realty, Inc. v. B.E.B. Properties New Par, d.b.a. Verizon Wireless, et al., v. Bruce Bird, et al
6 Jan 2020, 6:49 am by MBettman
Verizon Wireless, et al., v. [read post]
Legally Speaking Ohio - http://www.legallyspeakingohio.com
Court Imposes Caremark Fiduciary Duty on Corporate Officer
8 May 2008, 12:43 pm
In Miller v. [read post]
The Harvard Law School Corporate Governance Blog - http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov
Supreme Court Will Review CEQA Categorical Exemption Exception In Berkeley Hillside Preservation Case
23 May 2012, 4:31 pm by Arthur F. Coon
On May 23, 2012, the California Supreme Court by unanimous vote granted respondents’ and real parties’ petition for review of the First District Court of Appeal’s published decision in Berkeley Hillside Preservation, et al. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Indiana Copyright Litigation Update – BMI v. Southside II
7 Feb 2013, 8:20 pm by Kenan Farrell
Broadcast Music Inc. et al v. [read post]
Indiana Intellectual Property & Technology Blog - http://indianaintellectualproperty.com/
California Supreme Court Denies Review in Expedited CEQA Litigation over Golden State Warriors Arena Project Approval
18 Jan 2017, 9:10 am by Arthur F. Coon
(GSW Arena LLC, et al., Real Parties in Interest) (2016) 6 Cal.App.5th 160; Supreme Court Case No. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Students treated to 2d District arguments
11 Mar 2014, 1:39 pm
(B246549) Arroyo, et al. v. [read post]
Southern California Appellate News - http://socal-appellate.blogspot.com/
Indiana Trademark Litigation Update – Order Inn v. Ton Ganser et al
6 Apr 2014, 7:27 pm by Kenan Farrell
Ton Ganser et al Court Case Number: 1:14-cv-00517-TWP-DKLFile Date: Friday, April 04, 2014Plaintiff: Order Inn, Inc.Plaintiff Counsel: Ryan Gile of Weide & Miller Ltd.Defendant: Ton Ganser, TJ Enterprises of Indiana LLC, Does 1-10Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement, False Designation of Origin, Unfair CompetitionCourt: Southern District of IndianaJudge: Judge Tanya Walton PrattReferred To: Magistrate Judge Denise K. [read post]
Indiana Intellectual Property & Technology Blog - http://indianaintellectualproperty.com/
No Miller Act Setoff for Non-Federal Claims
2 Dec 2019, 9:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia last month. [read post]
Construction Law Musings - http://constructionlawva.com
Oral Argument Preview: What Should Trial Court Do About Post-Verdict Juror Letter? Madora Jones, Administrator of the Estate of ReDon Jones v. The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, et al.
9 Mar 2020, 4:40 am by MBettman
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, et al., 2019-0390. [read post]
Legally Speaking Ohio - http://www.legallyspeakingohio.com
Federal Middle District Court Judge Robert D. Mariani Issues Opinion On Coverage Question in Construction Case
17 Jan 2012, 10:53 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Co., et al.,3:10-CV-774, 2012 U.S. [read post]
Tort Talk - http://www.torttalk.com/
Maybe Supervising Qualifies as Labor After All
11 May 2023, 10:50 am by Christopher G. Hill
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland et al.? [read post]
Construction Law Musings - https://constructionlawva.com/
May class members join a new defendant to a successive, court-approved action for individual damages against the defendants from underlying class action litigation?
22 Aug 2007, 12:26 pm
In Miller, successive litigation to Engle v. [read post]
Class Action Blog - http://www.carltonfields.com/classactionblog/blog.aspx
First District Denies Rehearing and Publication Requests, Slightly Modifies Opinion With No Change in Judgment in CEQA Case Upholding U.C. Regents’ EIR for Parnassus Heights Campus Long-Range Development Plan; Petitions For Review Filed
8 Nov 2023, 10:25 am by Arthur F. Coon
On October 20, 223, the First District Court of Appeal (Div. 3) filed an “Order Modifying Opinion; and Denying Petitions for Rehearing and Publication [No Change in Judgment]” in Yerba Buena Neighborhood Consortium, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com